The additional bottom line referee did not see the ball kicked by Lefty against the goal keeper Vladimir crossed the goal line, in the defeat of Goiás 2-0 for Santos, over the weekend. But technology allowed by FIFA in Brazil after the World Cup could easily validate the player’s goal emerald.
With equipment installed only in 12 that Arenas were utlizadas during World, CBF chose not to use the technological system during the dispute of the Brazilian Championship. To be no inequality, the second vice president of the Arbitration Commission, Nilson de Souza Monsoon
-. This is an administrative issue. We have 12 arenas with cameras, this legacy by FIFA. Only in Sao Paulo have four stages, but only one has this system, the Corinthians Arena (…) may be used if it is determined by the command of the CBF, for now we only have the legacy left by Fifa. The thought of the Committee on Arbitration does have to have an equality is not just a stadium have this equipment and other non -. Highlighted Monsoon, “Writing SporTV”
According to story of “Folha de S. Paulo”, CBF would desembolçar £ 638,000 to install equipment in other stadiums that are used in Serie A – about 30 Furthermore, there is an expense of $ 10 000 per game , but FIFA had promised that would bear this cost for a period of one year after the World Cup – which was not necessary
-.’s use of technology is very welcome, by the arbitrators and the Commission. But in our campeonatot had 250 matches in Serie A and in fact only one ball that came or not. This happened only once – downplayed Monsoon
.
No comments:
Post a Comment